Why I love and also HATE FuzziBunz cloth diapers.

The tag of my insanely old FuzziBunz.

I love FuzziBunz. I love how well they work. I love how soft they are. I love how well they fit all three of my different shapes of children. Bla bla bla. I was just talking to a friend though, explaining how frustrating FuzziBunz are. My FuzziBunz simply would not give up. I got my first (and pretty much only) set of FuzziBunz on trade ten years ago. I did a little writing for one of the programs that FuzziBunz (Then Mother of Eden) was working on back then in exchange for a set of diapers.

They were awesome. I got a mix of gender neutral colors and boy colors. There were 12 in that original set. So, we used the same set for three years. See, sizing on FuzziBunz is for optimal fit, but in reality, you can make most of the sizes fit any child because they’re so adjustable, much to a fluff addicts dismay.

When I was done with them, I sold many of them. I loaned some of them out and got them back a couple of years later, just in time to use them on my stepson. By this time, I had a brick and mortar store, much like Everything Birth and FuzziBunz were my featured diaper. We used the remainders of that set on my step son. Of course, I purchased a few more to replace the ones I sold a few years earlier for the price I paid for them. When I got pregnant and learned I was having a girl, I thought, “Awesome, now I can get a whole new set of girl FuzziBunz at cost!” You know, since I was a reseller and all. No such luck though, my frugal husband said there was no need, because our diapers were still functioning perfectly. I did convince him we’d need a few more though since both kids would be in them. So, I found a few pretty pink shades and made sure they were always clean in time to go in public with my new baby girl.

But I wanted more.

I was always SO happy on the rare days when I would forget to pack enough diapers at the store and I would be FORCED TO steal a new diaper from myself. Likewise, I was happy when I’d be running late and I had to throw them in the dryer. After all, drying ruins them, right? While I don’t advise YOU dry your FuzziBunz on high heat, I did it all the time and they simply refused to die.

When my daughter had such bad eczema, I  never bothered to put a liner in the FuzziBunz, because I wanted them ruined. There were so many adorable floral prints coming out and I just wanted to be able to have an excuse to buy them all. I was really stoked when the creams I was told to use started making the FuzziBunz repel. That excitement was short lived though when a simple google search taught my husband he could use Dawn and a scrub brush on them and they were promptly revived.

These days, my step-son’s disability means we still use them at night on him. For a little while, they wouldn’t hold all the pee from a big boy because he required more inserts. See, while the extra inserts did fit in the pocket, we could no longer snap them. My son is now six years old and now that his accidents at night are smaller in volume, we’re right back at square one with the ugly old diapers plus the few I picked up along the way that I mentioned, stained from hard water, still hanging on. Both sets of snaps won’t reach, but apparently that has zero effect on the efficacy of FuzziBunz.

Seriously, am I going to be giving these things to my grandchildren?! This is getting a little ridiculous. I now wish I had paid cash for them so I could ask for my money back, after all they guaranteed them for a year or something short lived like that… and we’re now going on eleven. In a way, that’s ALMOST false advertising. Right?

So, anyway, if you want to join me in a lifetime of eternal FuzziBunz use (<–That was smarm, not an unofficial warranty.) you can buy some here.

Why Every Mom Should Have Homeopathic Arnica in Her Purse

Arnica is the number one remedy to consider for recent and past, primarily physical, trauma to the body. This trauma may have occurred through accidents, injuries, surgery, bruising, head injuries, sprains, childbirth, dental work, or even jet lag. Arnica promotes healing by controlling bleeding, reducing swelling, and preventing the formation of pus. -Atlanta Classic Homeopathy

 

Arnica is amazing stuff. I don’t want you to confuse this with just regular old Arnica though. Regular arnica can be dangerous to ingest. I’m talking about homeopathic arnica.  I use this kind of arnica for bumps, bruises and injuries:

Hyland's Homeopathic Arnica 30x, 250 tabs

You can buy it here. You give it orally and under the tongue.

Homeopathic Arnica Safety

The reason that you can feel 100% comfortable giving your child homeopathic arnica for injuries is because it is super diluted. That’s how homeopathy works. If you need some convincing about why homeopathy is safe, read this past blog. In addition, I try to explain why homeopathic remedies work so well and so quickly but are still safe here.

Homeopathy is not like our medicine of today. If you are going to understand homeopathy, you have to really just disregard everything you have been taught about medicine and realize homeopathy is absolutely foreign.

If modern medicine was the English written word, herbal remedies would be the French written word, but homeopathy would be Japanese Kanji.  Does that make sense? It’s TOTALLY different. It functions on a different level, in a different way and has different principle entirely.

 

 Why We Should Carry Arnica in Our Purses

Arnica can help with trauma wounds even if they are really old, but the most miraculous demonstrations of arnica’s ability happen when we give arnica withing about ten minutes of the initial injury. It can prevent the injury from taking a turn for the worst. Paramedics and ER doctors with education in homeopathy  have even claimed to have reduced or reversed traumatic brain injuries by promptly giving arnica. In an emergency situation, I give arnica on the way to the ER.  I’m not a doctor, but it doesn’t take a doctor to see how well arnica works. I’ve learned from reading Homeopathic journals that you can give arnica every ten minutes or so for the first hour to see dramatic healing results. So, at every stop light on the way to the ER, a mom could give one more pellet to get the best benefits from this remedy.

I stress that we should have it on hand because if your child falls down and hits his head really hard, you would rush them to the ER, right? It would seem irresponsible to head into the house to the medicine cabinet first. I’m not trying to just sell more arnica when I say this. (I don’t get commission.) I think that it’s a really good idea to have a few bottle of arnica at any given moment. I keep one in my homeopathic box at home. I’ve given one to Nana and Papa, so that if anything happens to one of my kids while in their care, my kids can have the same healing they would have had if they were at home with me. Then I keep one in my purse.

I got a call from my son’s school a few months ago. They wanted me to come get my son because he fell backwards and hit his head on the pavement. While they were observing him, he said he felt like he was going to throw up and that his head felt weird. They were worried about a concussion and wanted me to have the opportunity to take him to Urgent Care if I wanted.  I had arnica in my purse. I drove right up to the school and saw the enormous knot on the back of his head and the weird look on his face, and I was scared.  Immediately, not even concerned about if they would think it was weird, I gave him arnica and then signed him out. Then we went to urgent care. On the way, I kept giving him a pellet every time we were stopped for traffic. It was a relief knowing that at least since we couldn’t teleport to Urgent Care, I was making good use of the delay.

By the time we got to Urgent Care, the swelling was almost gone. Triage thought I was a little over protective, but I’ve been called worse things. They told me he was fine and commented on how sweet I was to worry, but that he did not have a concussion or even a bad injury.

 

Maybe my son never had a concussion. I can only tell you what my experience was. One homeopath wrote:

Arnica is also a great absorber of blood. For example, my patients have had amazing experiences with their kids who bump their heads and get a big egg on their forehead, which of course means there is a hematoma, a leakage of blood. With Arnica the swelling goes right down and then they don’t have to take their kids to the emergency room. -Dr. Luc De Schepper, M.D., Ph.D., D.I. Hom., C.Hom., Lic. Ac.

 

I have to say that I disagree with not needing to take a child to the ER with what would have been an otherwise serious injury. I like to take advantage of every single opportunity to protect my children. I know I’m not a doctor. I’m not going to presume to diagnose a children on my own. That’s not my job. I am just a mom, and my job is to do everything in my power to take care of them. In the event of a serious injury, I think that means giving arnica on the way to the hospital. Since homeopathic arnica is so tremendously safe, the only real risk of this plan of action is looking like a fool when your child ends up in triage with no remaining injury.

Haven’t had your fill of happy arnica stories, read the story about how my daughter plowed her face into the corner of a desk.

What are you waiting for? Buy a couple of bottles here so that you can look like an overprotective mom too!

 

 

 

PS: Read this amazing study about another potential use of arnica here

PPS: Make sure to store all homeopathic medicines out of the reach of children, not because they’re dangerous, (They aren’t.) but because they are so delicate, if a child touches them, it can inactivate them. For the same reason, never touch a homeopathic remedy with your hand; just dump a pellet into the cap and use the cap to drop it into the child’s mouth. Also, for the same reason, do not store homeopathic remedies near anything that has a strong smell like tea tree oil or peppermint toothpaste. That will also inactivate the entire bottle. Homeopathy is not chemical in nature, it takes on the essence of what it was exposed to. For example, homeopathic arnica is not actually arnica. It has just been EXPOSED TO arnica. (Read the links I mentioned above to learn more about this. ) So, if you expose it to something else, it can neutralize the intended “essence.” And that’s a waste of $7.50!

PPPS: Homeopathic arnica also works this well on pets.

Breasts: A different look at their place in sexuality.

Click photo to visit Elizabeth's Blog.

Everywhere I turn online right now, the breastfeeding discussion is raging, fueled by the cover of Time Magazine. I don’t want to get into the Time Magazine cover with this post though, I want to explain why, beyond a shadow of a doubt, breastfeeding is not sexual.

Breasts as Sex Organs

This all comes from the idea that breasts are also sexual organs. Well, here’s the deal: The reason that breasts are sexual organs is because we all know on an instinctive level  that when a woman grows breasts, she is entering her fertile years. We don’t think about it that way, of course. We think of it as separate, but it’s really not separate. A woman becomes sexy as she matures because sex is a biological function. Since we are animals, we have biological impulses. These impulses end up propagating the species. The breasts purpose isn’t to be sexual. The breasts purpose is to feed babies. Breasts are only sexual BECAUSE of their job in fertility.  Even though we have sex for fun, for bonding, or for any number of reasons, there is only one actual biological function of having sex: To make babies.

Sure, breasts are beautiful, but don’t you guys see why everyone likes them so much? Because they are a result of fertility, of physical maturity.  And we notice that on an instinctive level. Biologically, we are sexual beings so that we will reproduce. 

So, see, the whole point of breasts is to feed babies. So, instead of getting all weirded out by breastfeeding, if we like looking at sexy boobs, we should be grateful for breastfeeding, because it’s the only reason breasts are there in the first place. Let’s hope we never stop breastfeeding, lest maybe evolution would delete the boob gene. After all, evolution tends to delete genes whose loss will not have widespread negative biological effects on the species.

Sexual Gratification from Breastfeeding

Comments about women getting sexual gratification when they do extended breastfeeding are absurd. That is a statement only made by people who have never done it. I can state that confidently. I guess I’ll have to be really blunt and speak from personal experience to get this point across.  Sexual use of nipples feel nothing like breastfeeding.  Sexual use of nipples is stimulating, breastfeeding is relaxing.

I know it’s hard to believe if you’ve never done it, but breastfeeding doesn’t feel sexual. Similarly, when I go to the gynecologist and he examines my breasts, I don’t get turned on and I’m quite confident that he doesn’t either.

Perhaps people who call women who practice extended breastfeeding perverts should say the same of the gynecologists performing breast exams. After all,  he gets turned on touching boobs during sex, so he obviously gets turned on touching breasts during an exam. Right?

Wrong.

My gyno doesn’t get turned on examining boobs and women don’t get turned on nursing babies.

To presume otherwise is just being ignorant.

Besides, a Woman’s Sex Drive Varies By Hormones

All this talk about a woman being turned on because she nurses her toddler is even more foolish given that a woman’s sex drive is very much dependent on her fertility. While I’m sure men would like to think that woman are driven by their man’s burning hot sexuality, the fact remains, a woman’s hormones are a far more influential force in determining her sex drive.  Women are the most sexually driven while they are ovulating. While an egg will occasionally be produced while a woman breastfeeds, for the most part, nursing suspends strong ovulation hormones.

Boldly put, a breastfeeding women might desire sex for bonding, intimacy or other learned desires, but biologically, a breastfeeding woman generally doesn’t have the same desires that a non-breastfeeding, ovulating woman has. In my experience, when I was breastfeeding, even when my husband paid attention to my boobs, it wasn’t quite the turn on that it would have been if I were fertile. Actually, sex in general is never quite as exciting for a woman as when she is ovulating. It all goes back the whole reason we, as animals have sex: To make babies.

So there you have it: Breasts are sexy because the biological function of sex is to make babies and a woman having breasts imply that she is of childbearing years and able to feed the baby that the sexual activity creates.

Or even more simply: Babies are fed by boobs and made by sex.

 

 

Eczema Chronicles: Day 1

My three year old daughter has eczema. She was diagnosed with Atopic Dermatitis a couple of years ago.  She has been seen by several different pediatricians and an allergist. This is a picture of her skin when she was a few months old. Look closely and you will see there is not a clear spot on her body and she even had some infection on her face from it:

 

Again.

Here’s what her face looked like before we realized she was allergic to latex. The redness isn’t sunburn or a bad photo. Her skin was simply always irritated. Yes, that is crusty, weeping skin you see beneath her mouth and on her cheeks:

The first year of her life, I just prayed we could rush forward until she was old enough to be told not to scratch herself so badly. The most preciously innocent year of her life was spent trying out every cream imaginable. Nothing would work. For the longest time, when we were in public, people would ask what happened to her. “Was she burned?” I don’t have pictures of her from her worst days, because I deleted most of the bad ones while crying about it one night. Here she was during some of her better skin days when she was still tiny:

       

The doctor’s acted like it was sad, but no big deal. For starters, if her skin is doing that, what other reactions can’t I see? Plus, having Atopic Dermatitis isn’t just having a little itchy skin. It is life changing. Fending off infections is just the serious part, aching because your child’s skin it so itchy and painful is heartbreaking. Also, my daughter had to be antibiotics for a month after her skin became infected. (That was before I learned how to treat infections early with raw Manuka honey.) If someone suggested a lotion, we’d get it. She wore socks on her hands every single day. We even sewed up the sleeves of slightly over-sized shirts so that her fingers had no access to her body:

  

After trying everything the doctor suggested and every single lotion and soap we could find, we finally figured out that we could save a lot of the turmoil by using simple natural remedies. These worked really well, but they were treatments. They weren’t cures. It would always come back. After each vaccination, after playing on playgrounds, after missing allergens in her diet, when another child shared a rubber toy, or when her immune system was run down. Then, we’d need to do a treatment again. It was a never ending cycle. The best I could do was control it.

Now, I have found two studies (found here and here) that claim a very high success rate at curing atopic dermatitis. These studies don’t claim a temporary fix, they claim real genuine relief. I, along with a fellow blogger named Regina, are going to give these treatments a try. Regina’s daughter also suffers from chronic eczema. After a discussion on Everything Birth’s Facebook page, she decided she would join me in chronicling the use of the homeopathic treatments from these studies to see if our children can also benefit. We are sharing this very vulnerable and sensitive part of our lives because we know that so many of you know our reality all too well. Many of you made the switch to cloth diapers because of this very condition.

For the first time ever, I have hope that my daughter might know life without a nightly rub down in coconut oil, without Manuka honey spot treatments, without the head-to-toe, twice-daily, full body inspections.

Here are the rules I will go by as I try out the homeopathic treatment for atopic dermatitis:

  • I will not use steroid creams, medicated lotions, essential oils, herbs or special soaps.
  • If an area begins to become infected, I will immediatelyapply the Manuka honey. If it does not, I will not. If I have to use Manuka honey, I will report this to you.
  • If her skin gets worse without the herbal treatments we normally do, I’ll let you know, but I will start them back up again.
  • The first two weeks, I will use  Sulphur 30X HPUS, two times a day following the proper method for dispensing homeopathic remedies: NPO 15 minutes before and after, no strong scents, no touching the tablets.

It’s been four hours since her first dose of Suphur 30C HPUS. I am pleased to say that already her skin is less inflamed.  She claims she has no itching and that, “It’s drying up!” The non-inflamed sand paper feel of her chest and back that she lives with every single day of her life are already gone. I don’t want to get too far ahead of myself here, but here is her skin now, only four hours after treatment. Still dry and scaly, but a significant improvement is already being noticed:

I’ll keep you posted!

Forward-Facing Baby Wearing?

There’s been a bunch of discussion online recently about whether or not we should wear our babies forward-facing. The two biggest arguments against forward-facing baby wearing are that it creates over stimulation of the baby’s senses and that it encourages improper hip positioning.

Over Stimulation

Issues have been brought up such as having a baby forward facing might create too much stimuli for a baby. Indeed, it could. Yet, as a contrary point, I should mention that little ones often turn their heads to the side when being carried while facing in to watch the busy world pass by. They are curious about the world, more so than even their mamas. It’s a valid point that we don’t want to force stimulation on our littlest ones, but I don’t think that this is the best reason to refrain from forward-facing baby wearing in a baby carrier.

Hip Positioning

A strong argument that has been brought up is that forward-facing baby wearing doesn’t allow a baby’s hips and legs to grow properly . This reason is strongly supported by the International Hip Dysplasia Institute who says, ““If the hips are forced into a stretched-out position too early, the ball is at risk of permanently deforming the edges of the cup-shaped socket (hip dysplasia) or gradually slipping out of the socket altogether (hip dislocation). Hip dysplasia or dislocation in babies is not painful so this may go undetected until walking age and may also result in painful arthritis during adulthood.” The hips get stretched out when the legs are not separated.  Fantastic diagrams can be found about proper positioning of a baby’s legs here. Even my favorite baby carrier the Moby Wrap won’t “splay” the hips correctly if worn using a forward-facing position. Even still, with so much science to back up the fact that forward-facing, leg-dangling baby wearing is bad for the baby, that’s not the strongest argument either. Maybe as a scientist, specialist or chiropractor it would be.

Being a Natural Mother

I’m none of those things though. I am a mother. I find that instinct is my strongest guidance in the matter. To me, it sincerely does not feel right. Sure, I wore my babies forward facing sometimes, but I would always turn them back in before long because it didn’t feel right. It nagged at me. Perhaps because within me, beneath my social upbringing, beneath my intellect… I am a female primate tending to her young.

Just like she is:

baby wearing forward facing

Just like she is:

File:Crab-eating Macaque nursing.jpg

Photo by Muhammad Mahdi Karim

Just like she is:

forward facing baby wearing

Photo by Sage Ross

And this:

… Just never felt quite right to me.

What do you think? How do you feel about forward-facing baby wearing? I’m certainly no expert on this particular aspect, so I’d love to hear your opinions on the matter.

How did I miss this? Feed expressed breast milk at the same time of day as you pumped it.

express breast milk

Bag of expressed breast milk. Photo by: Haley Miller. (Click to see her blog.)

As if breast milk wasn’t already magical  scientifically superior enough, I just read an article from 2009 that demonstrates its awesomeness further. Turns out there’s yet another function (though possibly an incidental one) of breast milk that my daughter missed out on when she was drinking formula.

A study published in Nutritional Neuroscience said they found that breast milk contains various ingredients, such as nucleotides, which help regulate babies’ sleep. The study said that because of this, when women pump their breast milk, they should try to have the baby fed milk at the same time of day as when it was first expressed. The composition of breast milk changes, apparently, quite markedly throughout the day.

The scientists examined three nucleotides in breast milk (adenosine, guanosine and uridine) and observed how they varied over a 24 hour period. These three nucleotides either excite or relax the central nervous system.  It’s as though the breastmilk is helping the children fall asleep, not just from a full tummy, comfort and warmth, but from actual chemical make-up.

I am amused, thinking of marking the time down on a bag of expressed breast milk just because it reminds me of expiration times on the fried chicken when I worked at a deli as a teenager. I have to assume though, if paying attention to times marked on the bag of expressed breast milk helped a baby have a more pleasant day, I can’t imagine a day care, babysitter, or Grandma who wouldn’t be willing to pay attention.

I also wonder if that same concept could be used to help a baby rest before a car ride or doctors visit though as well. Oh, I know, that’s not its purpose, but armed with this kind of info-ammo, can you honestly say you wouldn’t be the least bit tempted to try feeding a 10PM bag of milk at 4PM if it meant a more relaxing visit to the pediatrician?

What do you think? How many of you were already wise to this? If you were, do you ever use it to your advantage to relax the baby during a stressful event?

 

Is obesity and increased age the main factor in the increased maternal death rate, or something else?

A recent article out of the UK cited obesity and increased age as the two main culprits for the doubling of maternal death rates during labor. While, those factors most assuredly would compound the issue, looking down further to the comments area beneath the article sheds a different light on the topic. This article infuriated women who think the issue has less to do with these factors and more to do with a decreasing level of care.

In a comment, Philomena Rhodes of Liverpool, England wrote,I’m so glad I had my kids in the 60s when midwives knew their stuff and I could have them at home. I feel sorry for women today in these production line hospitals with some staff who can barely speak the language. There have always been an element in the so called ‘care’ sector who don’t know the meaning of the word, but we didn’t see so much of it then.”

This production-line view of the modern birthing system is shared by an ever growing number of women, apparently for good reason.

In truth, after the photos and the ads in the UK article, hidden at the very end of the article, we get the actual quote from Professor Cathy Warwick, who is the general secretary of the Royal College of Midwives. Professor Warwick said, “Two factors are combining: maternity services are under pressure from a steadily rising birth rate while dealing with far more women with complex pregnancies.”

Then, at the very end, it explained that the Royal College of Midwives estimated that in the UK, an estimated 5000 more midwives were needed to handle the increased rate of births.

In a different study in Canada, we learned that in a normal pregnancy, midwife assisted home births were the safest way to deliver a baby. Midwife assisted homebirths resulted in less maternal and fetal deaths and an overall more positive outcome for the newborns.

Obviously, there are lots of factors to consider regarding increased maternal death rates. I think though, that articles like the one out of the UK are indicative of a bigger problem.  Why can’t all of us in progressive nations just admit, that pregnancy is not a disease to be treated, but a natural, healthy life event? Then, and only then, if a disease or health issue does arise, we can  be thankful for the interventions modern medicine has to offer us.

Do you believe the Canadian study that says the safest place to birth is, under normal circumstances, at home with a midwife assisting?

 

Failure to Progress?

I came across an article in Science & Sensibility that posed the question “How Long Can Labor Safely Be?”  The author, Henci Goer, discussed three sets of data that compared labor duration and outcomes. The perspective might shed a new light on the practice of medical intervention in situations where labor “fails to progress.”

Three Sources Compared

Two sources compiled data gathered about labors assisted by midwives. The third source was date from the  U.S. Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL). The CLS is a collection of 19 hospitals whose primary purpose is “to describe contemporary labor progression and to evaluate the timing of Cesarean delivery in women with labor protraction and arrest.”

All three groups involved spontaneous labor with a full term baby that was head down. Henci explained that since first time mothers usually have longer labors, the data that was used was based on first time mothers. Henci Goer wrote:

As you can see, labor averaged even longer in the physiologic groups without doing any harm to the newborns. As you can also see, the midwifery data blow active management concepts, now enshrined in partograms, out of the water. Setting 1 cm per hour as the threshold for abnormally slow progress—which allows 6 hours to go from 4 cm to 10—means augmenting first-time mothers dilating faster than the average rate!

In the two data sets where there was no intervention, there were no incidences of epidural,  oxytocin augmentation, or birth instruments used to assist delivery. None of the women in either of the natural labor data sets required a cesarean section.

The CSL labors involved a 60% epidural rate. The CLS used oxytocin to augment labor 37% of the time. 10 percent of the deliveries involved birthing instruments being used and 16% of all the deliveries resulted in a cesarean section.

Perhaps more importantly though, the CLS group of babies had five minute apgar scores of of less than 7 more frequently than the other two natural birthing groups.

So, What’s the Rush?

If deliveries are allowed to progress on their own, instead of by a time table that a large portion of women could not possibly labor in accordance with, what gives? The hospital where I delivered had schedules and it was so stressful. I was explained that they would like to see me progress 1 cm per hour at least.  If a woman progresses more slowly than that, many doctors will start the meds to speed up labor.  Well, as we all know, at least from discussing with each other, those labor accelerating drugs make labor hurt so much worse. That’s when we often accept their offer for an epidural. Well, you know the story from there.

epidural

This whole time though, I thought that the people who made these rules were genuinely concerned about labor taking too long because of their perceived risks to the baby. I have to believe that’s usually the case, but listen to this…

The CSL investigators, according to Henci, wrote that the extra two hours of average labor duration in first-time mothers (compared to cohorts from the 1960s) cost Intermountain Healthcare hospitals an extra $110.40 per labor. Grand total, Henci explained, that amounted to an annual excess cost of $600,466. The CSL investigators went on to say, “The implications for healthcare systems and payors are obvious and should drive a reconsideration of modern-day labor process management with an eye towards process improvement.”

So, it saves a lot of money to shave time off a labor. Then, if the labor doesn’t speed up or if the process stresses the baby out and the baby won’t come out vaginally, Cesarean Sections  are always on standby, with an almost $8000 price tag.

 

 

The Artificial Sweeteners & Preterm Birth Debate

artificial sweetener pregnancy

Photo from Lyn. Click to read her blog.

An analysis of 59,334 women from the Danish National Birth Cohort (1996–2002) was done and published in the American Clinical Journal of Nutrition. Researchers looked at soft drink intake in midpregnancy by using a food-frequency questionnaire in order to determine if women who drank soft drinks that were artificially sweetened had a greater risk of preterm delivery than women who drank regular soft drinks.

They found an association between intake of artificially sweetened soft drinks and an increased risk of preterm delivery:

“In comparison with women with no intake of artificially sweetened carbonated soft drinks, the adjusted odds ratio for women who consumed ge 1 serving of artificially sweetened carbonated soft drinks/d was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.65). The corresponding odds ratio for women who consumed ge 4 servings of artificially sweetened carbonated soft drinks/d was 1.78 (95% CI: 1.19, 2.66). The association was observed for normal-weight and overweight women. A stronger increase in risk was observed for early preterm and moderately preterm delivery than with late-preterm delivery. No association was observed for sugar-sweetened carbonated soft drinks (P for trend: 0.29) or for sugar-sweetened noncarbonated soft drinks (P for trend: 0.93).”

Of course, in fairness, the Aspartame makers commented on how this is really not a very valid study. (See why they think that here.) One of their big concerns is that the study used an odds ratio rather than a relative risk analysis in their results. That’s a good point. The aspartame makers feel it was because the numbers were just so low that that was the only way to show any impact. That was the only concern brought up that I felt was a valid enough reason to not mention what I found to you pregnant ladies in the Everything Birth Community. Then, I thought about it.

How big of a study do they want?  This was a huge sample of pregnant women.

I think they just worded it that way because they knew most people wouldn’t bother looking deeper and would conclude based on their argument that indeed, the actual numbers were too inconsequential to indicate any actual association.

59,334 soft drinking women were a part of this study.

Let’s look at where the women came from. These women were all of the ones that drank soft drinks in the larger Danish Cohort Study.

  • 101, 042 pregnant women and offspring were observed.
  • It incorporated about half of all Danish GPs.
  • It involved about 18% of all Danish pregnant women!

For me, if I were pregnant, I would consider this a large enough portion of a population to base a study on.

18% of all pregnant women would reflect trends.

Over half of them drank soft drinks. So about 1/10th of all of their society’s pregnant women were involved in the soft drink study.

So, just what were the preterm birth trends in their neck of the woods at that time?

In Denmark between 1995 and 2004 (which was the closest statistics that were explicit enough to use) the overall proportion of preterm deliveries out of all live births increased from 5.2% to 6.3%.

So, between 5 and 6 percent of live births are delivered before term over there.

The comments made by the Aspartame company about the choice in using odds ratios rather than relative risk was probably because of the extremely low number of preterm births is absurd in my opinion.  This is a huge sample. 1/10th of all pregnant women. I mean I get what they’re saying, but especially considering that there is another increase of risk of preterm birth demonstrated as these women increased their daily intake of artificially sweetened drinks, I think it’s something for us to think seriously about.

Is diet soda so awesome that it’s worth the risk the odds?

 

Common Baby Care Items, Obesity, and Diabetes

Scientists found that people exposed to phthalates were more prone to weight gain. Similarly, test subjects that had even ‘modest’ levels of phthalates in their bloodstream were twice as likely to develop diabetes. We have a childhood diabetes crisis in our country. Certainly there are numerous causes for the trend toward obesity in American children, but that doesn’t mean we just toss our hands in the air and give up.

So, where are our children getting phthalates from? Well, numerous sources actually. It’s in certain plastics, which is part of the reason why parents are reaching to natural wooden toys.

I found an article on Medscape posted this year that was published in the American Contact Dermatitis Society’s journal Dermatitis last year. The study looked into common baby products and found four common baby products that contained detectable levels of phthalates.  The sunscreen that was tested contained the highest levels, followed distantly by the baby bath, the body wash, and the moisturizer. The study didn’t mention the brand names of the products tested. So, we’re kind of left there hanging. Searching for baby products and phthalates, I noticed that Johnson and Johnson’s site references that their core baby products STILL contain phthalates. They did mention they are working to phase them out, but this struggle has been going on for way to long. I go into the timeline of Johnson and Johnson’s revolting unsafe baby product production here.

“DEP, the only phthalate used in our core baby products, has been extensively researched and confirmed to be safe by independent scientific review bodies in the U.S. and Europe. However, as part of our process of continuously updating our products, The Johnson & Johnson Family of Consumer Companies completed the worldwide phase-out of DEP in baby products late last year.”

CJ's BUTTer 4oz. TUBEEach new publication warning us of new-found concerns about ingredients in our baby products that we already knew were dangerous merely compounds the evidence. We can’t trust megacorporations like Johnson and Johnson with our babies.

There are genuinely toxin free baby products available online. Everything Birth even carries many baby care products that are actually natural and actually safe. Check them out here.